boston real estate blog   
617-595-3712/ realtyford@yahoo.com
137 Charles Street, Boston Massachusetts
boston real estate blog
Boston real estate. Boston condos.




Beacon Hill Feb Sale Prices On the Rise

beacon-hill-condo-sales-suprise

According to LINK the average sale price, median sale price and the price per sq ft increased for Beacon Hill condos when comparing Feb ‘09 to Feb ‘08. However, the number of sales dropped.

Feb ‘09

Avg. sales price – $755,875.00
Median sales price – $645,125.00
Avg. price per sq ft – $765.00
______________________________

Feb ‘08

Avg. sales price – $681,688.00
Median sales price – $330,375.00
Avg. price per sq ft – $718.00

Source: LINK

Read other posts about: Beacon Hill Real Estate, Beacon Hill condo sales

11 Responses to “Beacon Hill Feb Sale Prices On the Rise” »»

  1. Comment by Numbers Guy | 03/14/09 at 9:43 am

    All you need to do is look at the negative skew and limited dataset to know that this is just noise. I am baffled as to how anyone can draw any conclusions YOY, with 1 month of data, from 1 neighborhood, with so few observations and such large standard deviation.

    Run a simple t-test on the means, and you will see they are not statistically significant.

  2. Comment by Numbers Guy | 03/14/09 at 10:12 am

    Whooops…did it again, I meant positive skew…

  3. Comment by JohnF | 03/14/09 at 10:13 am

    Numbers Guy, Point well taken. I’ll be doing 1st Q stats comparing ‘09 to ‘08 in a couple of weeks. I know this is a lame excuse but today I’m lacking fresh ideas to blog about.

  4. Comment by JohnF | 03/14/09 at 10:21 am

    Beacon Hill on a year to year comparison the numbers are down according to LINK.

  5. Comment by Numbers Guy | 03/14/09 at 1:09 pm

    JohnF,

    Looking forward to it.

    If you’re looking for ideas, why not compare the previous 3 months of data for each neighborhood?

    It doesn’t have to be quarter by quarter…you can do look at December 14 – March 14, 2008 vs 2009…40 or more observations for each 3-month period (60 observations total) should be enough data to get a better sense of the real trend. If you don’t have 40 observations, expand to 4 months, 5 months, etc.

    However, I would point out, to be fair you should declare the period up front without looking at the data first (otherwise, you are “fishing”)…

    Thanks.

  6. Comment by Numbers Guy | 03/14/09 at 1:10 pm

    Meant 80 observations total…sometimes I type too fast and never proofread…

  7. Comment by John Ford | 03/14/09 at 2:35 pm

    Numbers Guy, Always open to new ideas. Fore-warn you might not like the resutls.

  8. Comment by Bradley | 03/14/09 at 3:09 pm

    Why might he not like the results, John F? Could it be because they’ll reveal my predictions to be true? :) :) :)

  9. Comment by Numbers Guy | 03/14/09 at 6:57 pm

    I own already, bought a small condo, right for me and my small family, back in 2003. I don’t have a vested interest either way, other than stability.

    My wife and I have front-end and back-end ratios are less than 20%. I won’t say how much lower than 20% though.

    A home is a place to live, not an investment. It may be a lifestyle for some, but that’s their choice. So, I look forward to seeing the data, which will tell me how many people made “lifestyle” decisions this year, in this economy.

    And now you know my MO. I cringe when people make lifestyle decisions, which in this city, in this economy, are still happening at a rate exceeded only in NYC, LA, and SF.

  10. Comment by Numbers Guy | 03/14/09 at 7:10 pm

    Almost forgot…we should define what we’re testing before you produce the data. And there should be discussion about whether your proposal is the most relevant to your claim. What is your claim? Is it:

    Beacon Hill sales buck the trend for the rest of Boston -or-

    All of REAL Boston is up, Up, UP!!! and traffic jams on Bradley’s street are at all-time highs -or-

    Back Bay and Sout End are surviving amdist the rest of the Boston neighborhoods edging down.

    For me, data supports a theory, rather than looking at small datasets — ancedotal data to find a theory. If you can provide hypotheses and let the data guide you, that will be a blog worth reading.

    I took the time to actually make this comment because I think it is the only source of information that, despite being run by a broker, has a reasonable chance of being objective. If you make it objective and data-driven, people will read.

    If it is a big cheerleading session, they will still read but not want to work with you on the RE side.

  11. Comment by JohnF | 03/14/09 at 11:38 pm

    Numbers Guy, thank you for taking the time to write your comments and I’ll follow-up on your ideas.

Leave a Reply »»

Comments may be moderated, edited or deleted; by leaving a comment, you are agreeing to the Terms of Service of this website.


Boston Real Estate/Boston Condos for Sale -
Search MLS

Select property type:
Select area:
Select property size:
Price from:
Price to:
MLS #



Categories!


Search past blog entries





Site tools


Add To Google      Subscribe To FeedBurner

Add To My Yahoo!

| | | |






Welcome

Are you considering the purchase or sale of a home in Boston?




Contact us today to discuss ways we can help make the experience easy and stress-free.








Real Estate Flyers


Boston Luxury Condos


Home Security


Ford Realty Inc - Boston
Boston condos


Denver Real Estate

Household Moving Companies

Boston Real Estate


Recent comments