boston real estate blog   
Sponsored by Ford Realty Inc.
139 Charles Street, Boston
realtyford@yahoo.com
617-595-3712
617-720-5454
boston real estate blog
| Home | Search Boston Condos | Search Boston Rentals | Buying
Real Estate
| Selling
Real Estate
| About Us | Contact Us



Most of us pay taxes … Some of us don’t

To everyone who claims that our wealthiest citizens pay more than their fair share of income taxes and we should cut them a break because they’re the ones who, you know, create jobs in our economy, I have four words for you:

Frank and Jamie McCourt.

The McCourts, who own the Los Angeles Dodgers (so she says; he says he’s the owner and she’s not), jointly pocketed income totaling $108 million from 2004 through 2009, according to documents Jamie McCourt recently filed in the couple’s divorce case in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

On that sum, they paid zero federal and state income tax. Jamie suggests that some tax breaks will apply this year too.

This reminds me of the old line about how true scandal lies not in what’s illegal, but what’s legal. It’s certainly an edifying window into the lengths some people will go to avoid paying taxes.

Read more: Taxman Strikes Out

Read other posts about: Everything to do with real estate, General real estate stories, real estate 2010

9 Responses to “Most of us pay taxes … Some of us don’t” »»

  1. Comment by anon2 | 02/25/10 at 4:29 am

    Almost half of all Americans pay no federal income tax. I am pretty sure it’s not the the top half. Finding one rich family who gamed the system doesn’t seem likely to be representative of who actually pays taxes. I think the IRS publishes more representative reports that show where the money comes from (it ain’t the poor).

  2. Comment by dong | 02/25/10 at 8:36 am

    I hate it when people bring up the fact that half all americans do not pay federal taxes. First off it’s less than half, probably closer to 40%.

    More importantly, most of these people are not people who have never or never will pay taxes. They are people like my parents who are retired and earn hardly anything and therefore don’t pay taxes. They paid their fair share in the past. They are also like my friends who are graduate students, scraping by. They will pay taxes someday. Being gainfully employed, and well paid, I’m happy to pay my taxes so that people at different stages of life aren’t unduly burdened.

  3. Comment by Mike | 02/25/10 at 10:59 am

    “most” of those people are elderly or students? Care to point to a source for that statement, or is it just your assumption that conveniently makes your point?

    And just because someone has low income, you think they should pay zero taxes? If they bear none of the tax burden, what incentive do they have to vote for an efficient government? After all, it’s not their money they government is spending. A substantial base of citizens who do not share in the tax burden is not a good thing. It encourages a dependency population.

  4. Comment by pain in the | 02/25/10 at 11:53 am

    Mike,

    Do you have a source to show that he is wrong? I’m really curious on who makes up this demographic

  5. Comment by dong | 02/25/10 at 1:19 pm

    I don’t know exactly what the student and retiree breakdown, but let’s use age as a proxy.

    http://faculty.ucc.edu/egh-damerow/u_s_demographics.htm

    About 12.5% of US Population is over 65.

    Another 14.5% is between the age of 15 and 24. I would only assume 40% of the people between the age of 15 and 24 are students who might file taxes for about 6%.
    Then another 14.5% are between the ages of 2% and 34, and of that group I would assume 10% are students who might file taxes, which makes another 1.45%.

    That gives about 20% of the US population that are likely students or retirees which is near 50% of the 40% of the U.S. that don’t pay taxes. Given that any given time there’s usually another 5% of that are unemployed because they got laid off, we have a rather large percentage that may not pay taxes. The fact is that many people will not pay taxes at different stages of their lives.

    I never said that I don’t think people should pay taxes, I think the use of the 40 or 50% statistic is way off base. It’s statistic intended to rile people up and stir them up into thinking there’s huge class of people taking advantage of the system which is just not true. That’s snapshot and not true representation of who’s paying taxes. It’s ok for people to pay more taxes at times when they can, and not pay them when they can’t. Why squeeze blood from a stone?

  6. Comment by Matt | 02/26/10 at 4:57 am

    Dong – the 40%-50% stat relates to households with zero tax liability, not individuals. It is likely that a decent chunk of that 15-24 demographic live in a household containing people in the 30-65 range. Agree with your point that people do indeed go through stages of life where they may have zero tax liability, but make up for it at other times.

    I don’t think this debate is a matter of people taking advantage of the system. Rather, it is more of an indication that the tax code in this country really needs overhaul. A lot of people I talk to have very little comprehension of the tax system…I am always suprised when people have no idea what their effective tax rate is, or do not even realize that we have a graduated tax rate in this country.

  7. Comment by Mike | 02/26/10 at 5:15 am

    Dong –

    Why are you including 100% of the elderly and student population in your buildup of the non-taxpaying population? Are you asserting that NO students or elderly pay no taxes? I highly doubt that.

    The 40% number is based on “tax units” which already aggregates people who are claimed as dependants by others (many students fall into this category, as well as the elderly) and excludes people who are not required to file a return and don’t.

    Of the 300 million or so in our US population, there’s only 151 million of these “tax units” (households who should file a return, plus some who do not need to file but do anyway), so many of the people you consider are already factored in.

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=2408

    I’m all for the government providing support for people who are in need, but to try to “hide” it in the tax system rather than making it visible is pretty shady in my opinion.

    And I’m not sure why you assert that none of this country’s students and the elderly pay taxes (you counted 100% of them as being part of the no taxes pool) – even “very little” is something, and the statistic is based on those with zero or negative tax liability. So students and the elderly, who make little and therefore pay little, are not all part of the population that pays zero or has a negative tax liability.

    Here’s an interesting article on the situation, and a very revealing quote:

    “The high percentage of people paying no federal income tax is not the result of the levy’s tax function. It is caused almost entirely by Congress’s insistence on using the tax system to deliver social benefits.”

    http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/blog/_archives/2010/2/25/4466208.html

    If the government is going to provide those benefits, it should do so directly where it can be seen and measured. And ALL people should be reminded each year about how their money pays for our government. They might insist on more fiscal responsibility as a result.

  8. Comment by dong | 02/26/10 at 5:59 am

    Mike, I’ll be first the agree that the tax system needs an overhaul. Obviously talking about the elderly and students, I made simplifying assumptions. There are plenty of people who are between 25-34 who pay no taxes. Young families with children, beginning their careers. I agree it’s fairly easy to be in situation if you live in tax state, and have other deductions not to pay federal taxes.

    We could argue all day about how we can slice up the tax units, but my basic point is that it’s unfair to lump all these people who don’t pay taxes as bunch od deadbeats which is just political posturing. I don’t believe most them are. Not to say there aren’t deadbeats, but citing that 40 or 50% is generally done incediary manner rather than a productinve one. The tax system needs reform, but we don’t need class warfare.

  9. Comment by Mike | 02/26/10 at 6:48 am

    Dong, I agree that people who don’t pay tax should not be characterized as “deadbeats” and I’m not sure that’s the intent behind the statistic. Those people are simply doing exactly what they’re supposed to do under the tax code and I doubt anyone else would do any different.

    The problem is that for an increasing percentage of the population, taxes are no longer an immediate concern. This dulls their focus on our government’s fiscal polices. At the extreme, this fosters a dependency culture where people look to the government as a source of income rather than a cost to be borne. And the larger that population becomes, the more of a problem it is.

    I am NOT saying all non-taxpayers ignore government fiscal policy, but with each increase in the percentage of non-taxpayers, the population who cares about fiscal issues decreases which is not a good thing. In my opinion, the best way to focus people’s attention on the waste and inefficiency of government is to have them share the burden of paying for it, even if it’s only a de-minimis amount. Our citizens should have some “skin in the game” so to speak, and right now that’s not happening.

    Proponents of “big government” are frequently interested in minimizing peoples understanding or perception of how much it really costs. That’s why there are so many social programs hidden in the tax code, so people focus on the “net” rather than the “gross”.

    I think when people focus on the percent of the US that pays taxes, it’s out of a desire to highlight this practice.

Leave a Reply »»

Comments may be moderated, edited or deleted; by leaving a comment, you are agreeing to the Terms of Service of this website.

Let's talk Boston real estate. The most recent real estate comments

  • sikka kaamna greens, Millennium vows to build a tall tower in the Big Hole: Thank you for providing useful...
  • Rich, New plans unveiled for Herald’s old South End site: My wife wants to see either a Whole Foods Market or a...
  • Rich, Downtown Crossing’s Big Hole to be filled?: This is of course good news. However, let’s not get too...
  • Seyi, Offer to purchase can be binding: I agree Gerry, I uusllay flag my listings until the home inspection issues...
  • Gloriane, Boston condo sellers: Can they specify a lender with an offer?: BS low – ratioalinty high! Really...
  • JohnF, Charles Street Retail Space Available for Rent: Thanks Bill, I spoke with your wife and I’m sure we can...
  • Bill, Charles Street Retail Space Available for Rent: I am looking for a small retail street level retail space for...
  • Funny, Rents hit record high in Boston: It’s not just Boston. Did you know rents in Worcester for a small 1...
  • John Ford, The economy and the local real estate market: Good info – thanks Nemo
  • Funny, To paraphrase Tom Brady: Mass. homes sales sucked in 2011: Imagine what would happen if 10-15% was shaved of...
  • Nemo, The economy and the local real estate market: The Labor Department does have a rate that includes all workers...
  • John Smith, A message from a Boston Real Estate Mortgage Broker: Thanks for your valuable post.I would like to know...
  • Rich, MetLife exits large portions of the mortgage business: MetLife is a very clever operator. In 2006, they sold...
  • Rich, Why the Fed didn’t see the housing crisis coming: Oh please. After the dot-com crash of 2000, the NASDAQ...
  • Funny, Is home ‘ownership’ a fraud?: smells of a gold digger. Next step is how we’re really all...
  • Suburban reader, Is home ‘ownership’ a fraud?: Incomprehensible indeed. It seems (I think) to assume that...
  • Rich, Is home ‘ownership’ a fraud?: I found the article incomprehensible.
  • SeanMarkup, ‘Back to 1990s home prices?’: Bangalore real estate prices are kissing skies day by...
  • Jaypee Kosmos, Beacon HIll Restaurant Space Available: Thank you !!! nice information found here… Jaypee Kosmos
  • Will F., I found the 1% and it’s not in Boston: This is true… Washington DC is a city of 600,000+...

  • Join us on Facebook Subscribe To FeedBurner Follow us on twitter Newsletter sign-up

    Welcome

    Are you considering the purchase or sale of a home in Boston?




    Contact us today to discuss ways we can help make the experience easy and stress-free.



    Search past blog entries





    Site tools


    Add To Google      Subscribe To FeedBurner

    Add To My Yahoo!

    | | | |





    Boston Real Estate/Boston Condos for Sale -
    Search MLS

    Select property type:
    Select area:
    Select property size:
    Price from:
    Price to:
    MLS #



    BOSTON REAL ESTATE AGENTS:

    Boston real estate agents needed for our two Boston locations.

    Inquiries contact John Ford @ realtyford@yahoo.com



    ------------------------------- Beacon Hill Real Estate: Retail Space Available

    Charles Street

    Commercial Retail Space Available

    For leasing inquiries contact

    Linda Mitrano at 617-512-4557.


    New Beacon Hill condo

    New Beacon Hill condo furnished listing for rent

    Offered at: $3,000.00

    Two bedroom hardwood floors, laundy in the building, common roof deck.

    More information call Linda Mitrano at 617-512-4557.


    Classic Beacon Hill Duplex Condo

    Including Income producing In-Law Apartment. Two units for the price of one.

    Offered at: $879,000.00

    Gracious parlor level living area offers open floor plan, fireplace, dining area,revovated kitchen with custom cabinents.

    Lower level offers master bedroom with full bath and laundry. Includes a second bedroom with half bath. This unique condo also features a two level In-law apartment with a seperate entry. One car deeded parking space.

    More information call Linda Mitrano at 617-512-4557.

    Boston neighborhoods



    Boston Real Estate / Boston Condos



    Click on the links below for Boston condo neighborhood sales listings

    Boston Back Bay Condos

    Beacon Hill Condos

    Boston Charlestown Condos

    Fenway Boston Condos

    Boston South End Condos

    ----------

    Boston Back Bay Condos 3rd Q 2011





    Back Bay Condo Sales 3rd Quarter 2011 - 150. Number of Back Bay condo sales in the 3rd Q of 2010 - 126

    Back Bay average condo sales price in the 3rd Q of 2011 - $974,258.00. Back Bay average condo sales price in the 3rd Q of 2010 - $944,320.00

    Back Bay condo 3rd Q 2011 sales price per square foot $736.88 Back Bay condo 3rd Q 2010 sales price per square foot $731.88

    Boston Back Bay condos days on market 3rd Q 2011 - 125 Boston Back Bay condos days on market 3rf Q 2010 - 106 Back Bay condo sales stats Jan - Sept 2011:

    Number of Back Bay Condo sales Jan through Sept - 334

    Avg Back Bay condo sales price - $1, 173,927.00

    Med Back Bay condo sales price - $795,000.00

    Avg price per square foot - $780.00

    Days on market for Back Bay Condo - 131

    Back Bay Condos - Sales Stats 2011



    Back Bay Condo Sales form April 1, 2011 - May 1, 2011 - 27

    Avg. Back Bay condo sales price - $1,324,226.00

    Med. Back Bay condo sales price - $1,210,000.00

    Back Bay condo sales price per square foot - $787.00

    Avg. days on the market for Back Bay condo - 184

    Boston Back Bay condos sold from Jan 1, 2011 - April 28, 2011 - 105.

    Average sales price for a Back Bay condominium in 2011 - $1,317,969.00

    Median sales price for a Back Bay condominium in 2011 - $865,000.00

    Average price per sqaure foot for a Back Bay condo in 2011 - $805.00

    Average days on the market in 2011 for a Back Bay condo - 153

    Back Bay condos/real estate sales for the 1st Quarter of 2011:

    Average Back Bay condo sales price - $1,290,181.00

    Median Back Bay condo sales price - $828,895.00

    Average Back Bay condo sales priec per square foot - $804.00



    Back Bay Condos Sold Jan 1, 2011 - April 16, 2011

    Back Bay condos sales - 97

    Average Back Bay condo price: $1,407,795.00

    Median Back Bay condo sales price: $852,500.00

    Average price per square foot for a Back Bay Condo $863.00

    -------------

    Back Bay Condos Sold 2011

    Back Bay condos sold: 50

    Average Back Bay condo sales price:$1,367,003.00

    Median Back Bay condo sales price: $953,750.00

    Average Price per $/SF: $806

    Average days on the market for a Back Bay condo: 124

    ------------



    Beacon Hill Condos Sales Stats 2011





    Beacon Hill condos sold form Jan 1, 2011 - April 28, 2011 - 37

    Average Beacon Hill condo sales price - $799,809.00

    Median Beacon Hill condos sales price - $560,000.00

    Average price per square foot for a sold Beacon Hill condo - $704.00

    Average days on the market for a Beacon Hill condo to sell - 165

    Beacon Hill condo sales 2011 Jan - Mar

    Beacon Hill condos sold

    Avg Beacon Hill condo price $823,500.00

    Med. Beacon Hill condo price $524,500.00

    Avg. price per sq ft. Beacon Hill condo $632.00

    Avg. days on market Beacon Hill condo 222

    -----------



    Boston Condos Brighton Sales Stats 2011





    Boston Brighton Condo sales - 25

    Brighton condo avg. sales price $259,510

    Brighton condo med. sales price $262,000

    Brighton condo price per sq ft $283.00

    Brighton condo days-on-market 90

    -----------

    Boston Condos Charlestown - Sales Stats





    Charlestown condo sales - 25

    Charlestown average condo - $545,019

    Charlestown median condo - $470,000

    Average price per sq ft Charlestown condo $458.00

    Average days-on-market 123

    -----------



    Fenway Condos Sales Stats 2011







    Fenway Condo Sales 2011

    Fenway condo sales 7

    Average Fenway condo price $292,500

    Median Fenway condo price $282,500

    Fenway price per sq ft $435.00

    Fenway days-on-market 237

    -----------